13,668
edits
Talk:Kiawe's Marowak: Difference between revisions
→Moveset
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:Current Bulbapedia policy is that a move must be explicitly identified in order for us to attribute it. If it's not identified but people still think it has a unique animation, then you should wait for it to be okayed before adding it (anyone can have an opinion; waiting for approval will help avoid edit wars). | :Current Bulbapedia policy is that a move must be explicitly identified in order for us to attribute it. If it's not identified but people still think it has a unique animation, then you should wait for it to be okayed before adding it (anyone can have an opinion; waiting for approval will help avoid edit wars). | ||
:Also remember that the moves may be identified in the dub's CCs. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | :Also remember that the moves may be identified in the dub's CCs. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 22:55, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
::FWIW, your question in conjunction with [[User talk:Force Fire/List of moves with unique animations#SM034 moves|an earlier question about the same issue]] shows ''exactly'' why we require explicit identification: You've concluded that Marowak's head shining means it's using Headbutt, while FinnishPokeFan92 observed the same thing and concluded it was Iron Head. You both can't be right, and you might both be wrong. And it will always be possible for disagreements to happen over these kind of "eye of the beholder" assumptions for ''any'' move that's not explicitly identified and doesn't have a unique animation. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 23:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | |||