Fanon: Difference between revisions

Fanon (view source)

Revision as of 17:57, 17 July 2017

10 bytes added , 17 July 2017

m

Spotted a mistake that escaped my 10 or so preview attempts.

Evie

76

edits

Revision as of 17:57, 17 July 2017 (view source) Evie (talk \| contribs) m (Cleaning up and developing this article.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:57, 17 July 2017 (view source) Evie (talk \| contribs) m (Spotted a mistake that escaped my 10 or so preview attempts.) Newer edit →
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Shipping, the belief that two characters are or should be romantically interested in each other, is one of the best known example of fanon. However, not all [[Shipping:List of shippings\|named shippings]] represent fanon theories. While some, such as [[Shipping:RocketShipping\|RocketShipping]] are extremely influential theories, others, such as those involving characters who have never met on screen, are neither popular nor influential (and thus, not fanon). In addition, a number of named shippings are humoristic in nature, and not actual theories supported by fans. These, likewise, are not part of fanon.		Shipping, the belief that two characters are or should be romantically interested in each other, is one of the best known example of fanon. However, not all [[Shipping:List of shippings\|named shippings]] represent fanon theories. While some, such as [[Shipping:RocketShipping\|RocketShipping]] are extremely influential theories, others, such as those involving characters who have never met on screen, are neither popular nor influential (and thus, not fanon). In addition, a number of named shippings are humoristic in nature, and not actual theories supported by fans. These, likewise, are not part of fanon.

	Likewise, ''confirmed'' shippings, such as [[Shipping:BalanceShipping\|BalanceShipping]] ([[Norman]] and [[Caroline]]), who are known to be a couple are canon, and thus not fanon.		Likewise, ''confirmed'' shippings, such as [[Shipping:BalanceShipping\|BalanceShipping]] ([[Norman]] and [[Caroline]], who are known to be a couple are canon) are canon, and thus not fanon.