13,669
edits
Talk:Sinnoh Route 223: Difference between revisions
→Octillery with Good Rod.
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::I did the math of the encounter rates. And got that. Two 40% slots, 15% slot, a 4% slot, and a 1% slot. Same as in gen 3. --[[User:PrismNeoCrimson|PrismNeoCrimson]] ([[User talk:PrismNeoCrimson|talk]]) 12:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)PrismNeoCrimson | ::I did the math of the encounter rates. And got that. Two 40% slots, 15% slot, a 4% slot, and a 1% slot. Same as in gen 3. --[[User:PrismNeoCrimson|PrismNeoCrimson]] ([[User talk:PrismNeoCrimson|talk]]) 12:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)PrismNeoCrimson | ||
:::It's not the same as in Gen 3. It shouldn't even be, Gen 3 did slots differently for each rod. Please try to avoid such assumptions. You should be able to cite a reliable source. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | :::It's not the same as in Gen 3. It shouldn't even be, Gen 3 did slots differently for each rod. Please try to avoid such assumptions. You should be able to cite a reliable source. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:20, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
::::Question for staff: Veekun lists [https://veekun.com/dex/locations/sea%20route%20223 encounter data] that is presumably ripped directly from the games and differs slightly from both what we already had and what PrismNeoCrimson tried to add, but it makes a lot of sense in reconciling those two wrong claims. I know we can't normally take data from other fansites, but since we provide a link to Veekun on every species page, does that mean we have some kind of deal/partnership with Veekun that might give us permission to use that data? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:24, 9 July 2017 (UTC) | |||