12,231
edits
User talk:SnorlaxMonster: Difference between revisions
→Generation II AI misses
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 598: | Line 598: | ||
:Well, we could certainly create a {{redlink|Miss}} article and include them there. Otherwise, I don't really have any good ideas. (Miss has been on my personal sticky note of articles to create for years, just like [[#New pages notability|confusion]] and [[Rare Candy]].) --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC) | :Well, we could certainly create a {{redlink|Miss}} article and include them there. Otherwise, I don't really have any good ideas. (Miss has been on my personal sticky note of articles to create for years, just like [[#New pages notability|confusion]] and [[Rare Candy]].) --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 03:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
::That'd be a good place for it, yes. Have you also considered a more general article on hitting, that would include things like accuracy tests (and their bypass), "miss", "fail", "ineffective", "protection", and "lack of target"? I guess all but "ineffective" could even redirect there, and we could even try to include something on additional effects, possibly even target/range. The title isn't as straightforward (maybe the lack of a good title is the main counterargument), but I guess a more general page could be more useful!? (I don't really like our current [[accuracy]] article, especially if we relocate the Gen I glitch, so maybe we should keep in mind to also improve it along the way!?) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC) | ::That'd be a good place for it, yes. Have you also considered a more general article on hitting, that would include things like accuracy tests (and their bypass), "miss", "fail", "ineffective", "protection", and "lack of target"? I guess all but "ineffective" could even redirect there, and we could even try to include something on additional effects, possibly even target/range. The title isn't as straightforward (maybe the lack of a good title is the main counterargument), but I guess a more general page could be more useful!? (I don't really like our current [[accuracy]] article, especially if we relocate the Gen I glitch, so maybe we should keep in mind to also improve it along the way!?) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 16:30, 2 June 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::I'd like to have an answer here, please. Have you considered it? Is it infeasible/worse, do you have an opinion? (I guess neither of us want to give the impression that we're just blindly editing without a necessary level of cooperation and thought, or even against each other; I'm very sure on my part, I will ''strongly'' counteract and avoid giving that impression.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 15:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC) | |||