User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 6: Difference between revisions

User talk:Pumpkinking0192/Archive 6 (view source)

Revision as of 16:00, 7 March 2017

612 bytes added , 7 March 2017

→‎A bit late, but...

Pumpkinking0192

13,669

edits

Revision as of 13:12, 7 March 2017 (view source) Celadonkey (talk \| contribs) (→‎A bit late, but...: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:00, 7 March 2017 (view source) Pumpkinking0192 (talk \| contribs) (→‎A bit late, but...) Newer edit →
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Why did you delete my origin for Nihilego? Nihil (nothing) + ego (refers to Freud's psychological ego, which is the rational decision making part of the psyche) refers to how Nihil has no ego, and only has an id (the survival and instinctual part of the psyche, which obviously relates to Nihilego. --[[User:Celadonkey\|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey\|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 13:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)		Why did you delete my origin for Nihilego? Nihil (nothing) + ego (refers to Freud's psychological ego, which is the rational decision making part of the psyche) refers to how Nihil has no ego, and only has an id (the survival and instinctual part of the psyche, which obviously relates to Nihilego. --[[User:Celadonkey\|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey\|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 13:12, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
			:Ah, I misinterpreted what you wrote. The previous name origin was structured as "[ nihil (nothing) + ego (I) ] or ego (psyche)", so I had that on my brain and didn't realize yours was intended to be structured as "nihil (nothing) + [ ego (I) or ego (psyche) ]". Because of this, I didn't realize you meant "nihil (nothing) + ego (psyche) = only an id"; I took it simply as "ego (psyche) = close enough to id". Yeah, that was my bad. If you change it back, though, can you try to make the structure clearer? [[User:Pumpkinking0192\|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192\|talk]]) 16:00, 7 March 2017 (UTC)