13,668
edits
Anubis91330 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
I think that in this section, and in "branched eolutions" and "cross-generation", it would be a good idee to include Alola forms as if it was another Pokémon. For the Pikachu family, we would have Pichu, then Pikachu and after, Raichu and Alola Raichu.--[[User:Anubis91330|Anubis91330]] 09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) | I think that in this section, and in "branched eolutions" and "cross-generation", it would be a good idee to include Alola forms as if it was another Pokémon. For the Pikachu family, we would have Pichu, then Pikachu and after, Raichu and Alola Raichu.--[[User:Anubis91330|Anubis91330]] 09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Our policy has always been very firmly that forms and Megas do not count as "another Pokémon," so I think it would be self-contradictory to start doing it now with Alola Forms. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC) |
edits