Talk:List of Pokémon by evolution family: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 165: Line 165:


I think that in this section, and in "branched eolutions" and "cross-generation", it would be a good idee to include Alola forms as if it was another Pokémon. For the Pikachu family, we would have Pichu, then Pikachu and after, Raichu and Alola Raichu.--[[User:Anubis91330|Anubis91330]]  09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
I think that in this section, and in "branched eolutions" and "cross-generation", it would be a good idee to include Alola forms as if it was another Pokémon. For the Pikachu family, we would have Pichu, then Pikachu and after, Raichu and Alola Raichu.--[[User:Anubis91330|Anubis91330]]  09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
:Our policy has always been very firmly that forms and Megas do not count as "another Pokémon," so I think it would be self-contradictory to start doing it now with Alola Forms. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
13,668

edits