2
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon by evolution family: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon by evolution family (view source)
Revision as of 08:12, 16 October 2016
, 16 October 2016no edit summary
Anubis91330 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 161: | Line 161: | ||
According to this page, there are 113 Pokémon that do not evolve in Gen VI. According to the category, [[:Category:Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line]], there are 112 Pokémon that do not evolve. Is there an explanation for the count being off or is it an error? --[[User:Super goku|Super goku]] ([[User talk:Super goku|talk]]) 01:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | According to this page, there are 113 Pokémon that do not evolve in Gen VI. According to the category, [[:Category:Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line]], there are 112 Pokémon that do not evolve. Is there an explanation for the count being off or is it an error? --[[User:Super goku|Super goku]] ([[User talk:Super goku|talk]]) 01:17, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Besides [[User:Iml908/Furfrou]], the category was missing {{p|Unown}} and {{p|Arceus}}, which I've just added. Neither count appears to include {{p|Phione}} or {{p|Manaphy}}, which don't evolve, since we treat them as an evolutionary line. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | :Besides [[User:Iml908/Furfrou]], the category was missing {{p|Unown}} and {{p|Arceus}}, which I've just added. Neither count appears to include {{p|Phione}} or {{p|Manaphy}}, which don't evolve, since we treat them as an evolutionary line. --[[User:Abcboy|Abcboy]] ([[User talk:Abcboy|talk]]) 02:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Inclusion of Alola Forms == | |||
I think that in this section, and in "branched eolutions" and "cross-generation", it would be a good idee to include Alola forms as if it was another Pokémon. For the Pikachu family, we would have Pichu, then Pikachu and after, Raichu and Alola Raichu.--[[User:Anubis91330|Anubis91330]] 09:12, 16 October 2016 (UTC) | |||