User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Line 1,101: Line 1,101:
:::But long story short, you've just got ''so'' little. You mention {{p|Swirlix}}. Swirlix at least ''looks'' '''exactly''' like cotton candy. (You also mention {{p|Morelull}}, but its typing is not mentioned on its page at all.) {{p|Marill}}? Marill hardly looks like a mouse, and doesn't look like a tooth fairy, and isn't connected to teeth in any particular way. If anyone's biased here, it's you, wanting an explanation badly enough to be more certain about your theory than is really reasonable. I'll admit, you've got some interesting coincidences and you ''could'' be right... But that's about ''all'' you have: coincidences; it could easily be something else entirely, something that makes much plainer sense (if only we knew about it). You also argue they basically internally retconned Marill to justify it being Fairy; but that's ''really'' not a good assumption either (as we often say: "don't assume").
:::But long story short, you've just got ''so'' little. You mention {{p|Swirlix}}. Swirlix at least ''looks'' '''exactly''' like cotton candy. (You also mention {{p|Morelull}}, but its typing is not mentioned on its page at all.) {{p|Marill}}? Marill hardly looks like a mouse, and doesn't look like a tooth fairy, and isn't connected to teeth in any particular way. If anyone's biased here, it's you, wanting an explanation badly enough to be more certain about your theory than is really reasonable. I'll admit, you've got some interesting coincidences and you ''could'' be right... But that's about ''all'' you have: coincidences; it could easily be something else entirely, something that makes much plainer sense (if only we knew about it). You also argue they basically internally retconned Marill to justify it being Fairy; but that's ''really'' not a good assumption either (as we often say: "don't assume").
:::There's simply not enough there. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 03:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
:::There's simply not enough there. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 03:00, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
:::: "Coincidences", huh. *sigh*
:::: Better than no explanation. Anyways, thanks for hearing me out. If you say so I won't disagree. [[User:ExLight|ExLight]] ([[User talk:ExLight|talk]]) 03:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
330

edits