19,326
edits
No edit summary |
|||
Line 143: | Line 143: | ||
:It's mostly just an owl's face in cartoon form. What you're seeing is basically just coincidence. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 16:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | :It's mostly just an owl's face in cartoon form. What you're seeing is basically just coincidence. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 16:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
::Pretty confident it's not. Apart from the curve at the top and bottom, Rowlet's beak lines up perfectly with the rest of the circle around it's eyes and a perfect venn diagram can be layed over the top, which is certainly not the case with a real owl at all. It's quite clearly purposeful. | ::Pretty confident it's not. Apart from the curve at the top and bottom, Rowlet's beak lines up perfectly with the rest of the circle around it's eyes and a perfect venn diagram can be layed over the top, which is certainly not the case with a real owl at all. It's quite clearly purposeful. {{unsigned|Rowl}} | ||
:::No, no it's not. And even if it was, we don't know nearly enough about Rowlet to justify adding it to the article. [[User:Ataro|Ataro]] ([[User talk:Ataro|talk]]) 17:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC) |