40,987
edits
User talk:ArghyaAnimecrazy: Difference between revisions
→Formatting
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 125: | Line 125: | ||
:We understand technical limitations. If you'll endeavor to address/remember whatever you can control of the above, that's fine. Thanks. =) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | :We understand technical limitations. If you'll endeavor to address/remember whatever you can control of the above, that's fine. Thanks. =) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:04, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
::As a little further advice, I'd also like to suggest that phrases like "its opponent" aren't really a good choice when we can be more specific. The only reason it might be appropriate is if it were something like a situation where the heroes are fighting a whole group of the same Pokemon. Otherwise it's just confusing to go from having mentioned ''exactly'' who someone's been fighting with (like, ''Trevor sent out Ludicolo and Sawyer sent out Aegislash'') to suddenly becoming coy about naming them (like ''Ludicolo's attack hit its opponent''; when ''Ludicolo's attack hit Aegislash'' is definitely no worse and certainly less ambiguous—in short, don't make the reader think they have to think of a name when they already know it, or that there is no specific name when there is). For the most part, words like "latter" and "aforementioned" are the same. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | ::As a little further advice, I'd also like to suggest that phrases like "its opponent" aren't really a good choice when we can be more specific. The only reason it might be appropriate is if it were something like a situation where the heroes are fighting a whole group of the same Pokemon. Otherwise it's just confusing to go from having mentioned ''exactly'' who someone's been fighting with (like, ''Trevor sent out Ludicolo and Sawyer sent out Aegislash'') to suddenly becoming coy about naming them (like ''Ludicolo's attack hit its opponent''; when ''Ludicolo's attack hit Aegislash'' is definitely no worse and certainly less ambiguous—in short, don't make the reader think they have to think of a name when they already know it, or that there is no specific name when there is). For the most part, words like "latter" and "aforementioned" are the same. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:25, 9 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
You are still using the wrong format. Please use the correct, standard format when writing down the synopsis or don't do it at all. If it's due to technical limitations, then I'd advise you use something that can give you the ability to type out longer edits.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 08:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC) | |||