16,517
edits
User talk:SatoMew2/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
→Massive edits: new section
(→Massive edits: new section) |
|||
| Line 365: | Line 365: | ||
::I get your point about status moves not dealing damage (although I think "no damage" can easily be considered a type of damage to resolve this). What I don't understand is why you think that the damage category being a property of the move makes the term inaccurate. I think "category" alone is simply too broad to describe these three possible values of a single property of moves. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 14:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | ::I get your point about status moves not dealing damage (although I think "no damage" can easily be considered a type of damage to resolve this). What I don't understand is why you think that the damage category being a property of the move makes the term inaccurate. I think "category" alone is simply too broad to describe these three possible values of a single property of moves. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 14:42, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::Thus the suggested title "Move category" to fix this problem. [[User:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:blue">Sato</span></b>]][[User talk:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:pink">Mew</span></b>]] 14:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | :::Thus the suggested title "Move category" to fix this problem. [[User:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:blue">Sato</span></b>]][[User talk:SatoMew2|<b><span style="color:pink">Mew</span></b>]] 14:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Massive edits == | |||
When planning on making edits that will remove [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Pok%C3%A9mon_controversy&curid=2154&diff=2277585&oldid=2243938 over half an article's content], it's highly advisable to actually discuss the changes you intent to make, rather than simply gutting an article to its bones just to suit your own personal beliefs on how articles should be presented. Your edits to the [[Pokémon controversy]] article have been reverted. - [[User:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#DA70D6;">Kogoro</span>''']] '''-''' [[User talk:Kogoro|'''<span class="sc" style="color:#FFB6C1;">Talk to me</span>''']] - 20:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC) | |||