Talk:List of Pokémon by base stats (Generation VI): Difference between revisions

m
→‎Sort by Evolutionary Status?: oh yea...don't redo a signature later (policy)
m (→‎Sort by Evolutionary Status?: oh yea...don't redo a signature later (policy))
Line 175: Line 175:
::::::Why does something have to be completely and totally needed on all levels to be allowed on the page? It ''doesn't'' hurt. This confusion that you're saying ''might'' occur is not even a confusion worth worrying about. It's a subjective confusion, not a confusion of disorientation. If someone comes to the page and sees that column, they're not going to be unable to use the page at all. They might possibly say "Why is that there? It doesn't need to be," but it's not going to harm their experience on the page. They can simply look past it. And who's to say the people that don't see the need for it will be the majority? It's quite possible that most people who visit the page will actually use that column, even if only because it's there.  
::::::Why does something have to be completely and totally needed on all levels to be allowed on the page? It ''doesn't'' hurt. This confusion that you're saying ''might'' occur is not even a confusion worth worrying about. It's a subjective confusion, not a confusion of disorientation. If someone comes to the page and sees that column, they're not going to be unable to use the page at all. They might possibly say "Why is that there? It doesn't need to be," but it's not going to harm their experience on the page. They can simply look past it. And who's to say the people that don't see the need for it will be the majority? It's quite possible that most people who visit the page will actually use that column, even if only because it's there.  
::::::And I'm not sweeping your argument aside; I'm merely pointing out that it holds no more weight than my counter-argument to it, and they suspended in a metaphorical clash of equal force. They are indeed available for others to take stances on. Neither I nor you can sweep the other argument aside based on whether we'd individually be confused or appreciative by the addition.
::::::And I'm not sweeping your argument aside; I'm merely pointing out that it holds no more weight than my counter-argument to it, and they suspended in a metaphorical clash of equal force. They are indeed available for others to take stances on. Neither I nor you can sweep the other argument aside based on whether we'd individually be confused or appreciative by the addition.
::::::When it comes down to it, you're treating something that may or may not be helpful in the big picture as something that will almost definitely not be helpful, even to the extent of being ''unhelpful''. Why couldn't we put it on the page, leave it there for a while and see what people think? If people complain, then okay, take it back off. If people say nothing or even display an appreciation for it, then we could leave it! How about that? [[User:UltraX7|UltraX7]] ([[User talk:UltraX7|talk]]) 22:25, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::When it comes down to it, you're treating something that may or may not be helpful in the big picture as something that will almost definitely not be helpful, even to the extent of being ''unhelpful''. Why couldn't we put it on the page, leave it there for a while and see what people think? If people complain, then okay, take it back off. If people say nothing or even display an appreciation for it, then we could leave it! How about that? {{unsigned|UltraX7}}


:::::::And why should I have to look past something wholly tangential to the real purpose of a page? If everyone could add anything that might be useful to a few people, then we'd surely end up with a mess sooner or later. Therefore,  there should be a compelling (or perhaps agreeable) need or purpose for what's on a page.
:::::::And why should I have to look past something wholly tangential to the real purpose of a page? If everyone could add anything that might be useful to a few people, then we'd surely end up with a mess sooner or later. Therefore,  there should be a compelling (or perhaps agreeable) need or purpose for what's on a page.