30,366
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon by base stats (Generation VI): Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon by base stats (Generation VI) (view source)
Revision as of 21:59, 19 January 2015
, 19 January 2015→Sort by Evolutionary Status?: there's no reason to try to space out everyone's comments...
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) (→Sort by Evolutionary Status?: there's no reason to try to space out everyone's comments...) |
|||
| Line 169: | Line 169: | ||
::::I didn't say 'why not' was a reason -- I was legitimately asking. And whether you'd be confused by it is only as valid an argument as me saying I wouldn't be confused. Your personal confusion contributes nothing to your argument. Granted, neither does my personal appreciation for it. There would be both people who do and people who don't appreciate its presence. There would be people who say "I dunno why that's there," and then probably move on. There would also be people who say "Hey, that's convenient," and then proceed to utilise it. True, it's not necessarily needed, but it's not necessarily unneeded either. [[User:UltraX7|UltraX7]] ([[User talk:UltraX7|talk]]) 21:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | ::::I didn't say 'why not' was a reason -- I was legitimately asking. And whether you'd be confused by it is only as valid an argument as me saying I wouldn't be confused. Your personal confusion contributes nothing to your argument. Granted, neither does my personal appreciation for it. There would be both people who do and people who don't appreciate its presence. There would be people who say "I dunno why that's there," and then probably move on. There would also be people who say "Hey, that's convenient," and then proceed to utilise it. True, it's not necessarily needed, but it's not necessarily unneeded either. [[User:UltraX7|UltraX7]] ([[User talk:UltraX7|talk]]) 21:45, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::You're playing word games. It ''is'' unneeded. Being useful to some people is ''not'' the same as being "needed" (or "not unneeded"...). It has nothing to do with the topic. | |||
:::::And confusion is a valid argument; confusion should be avoided. Your lack of confusion is merely a counterpoint. How the balance between your point and mine lies is for each reader to decide for themselves, but you cannot just sweep it aside as inherently invalid. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 21:59, 19 January 2015 (UTC) | |||