30,387
edits
Bry Landry (talk | contribs) |
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 681: | Line 681: | ||
:It's not really "only" if there's more than one Pokémon from a branched evolutionary line. '''''[[User:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">--Pokemaster</span>]][[User talk:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">97</span>]]''''' 16:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | :It's not really "only" if there's more than one Pokémon from a branched evolutionary line. '''''[[User:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">--Pokemaster</span>]][[User talk:Pokemaster97|<span style="color:Blue;">97</span>]]''''' 16:27, 12 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
::He said "only two" meaning there are two. I think it is worth adding. [[User:Bry Landry|Bry Landry]] ([[User talk:Bry Landry|talk]]) 00:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | ::He said "only two" meaning there are two. I think it is worth adding. [[User:Bry Landry|Bry Landry]] ([[User talk:Bry Landry|talk]]) 00:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::You can call any number "only" so long as you consider it ''relatively'' small. But that's the problem: that's subjective. So as a rule we generally consider things that aren't entirely exclusive/unique to be unnotable. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC) |