5,094
edits
Talk:Victreebel (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→The Pokédex is wrong: Good point, TW.
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
(→The Pokédex is wrong: Good point, TW.) |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
:That's not necessarily the case. Its acid can dissolve anything, sure, but not ''everything''. There may be a lining that prevents Victreebel from dissolving itself. For a real life analogy, stomachs of animals (including humans) contain acidic juices which digest food, yet a lining prevents the stomach from digesting itself. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 14:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | :That's not necessarily the case. Its acid can dissolve anything, sure, but not ''everything''. There may be a lining that prevents Victreebel from dissolving itself. For a real life analogy, stomachs of animals (including humans) contain acidic juices which digest food, yet a lining prevents the stomach from digesting itself. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 14:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
::..."anything, sure, but not ''everything''"? No... That is a contradiction; both of those cannot be true. Mangaman has it right. That said, personally I could care less about remarking on commonplace "anime physics" (/logic). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | ::..."anything, sure, but not ''everything''"? No... That is a contradiction; both of those cannot be true. Mangaman has it right. That said, personally I could care less about remarking on commonplace "anime physics" (/logic). [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::Yeah, now that I think about it. Then again, it could simply be another case of "Pokéden exaggeration." [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 14:58, 9 April 2014 (UTC) | |||