30,366
edits
Talk:List of Pokémon by evolution family: Difference between revisions
Talk:List of Pokémon by evolution family (view source)
Revision as of 14:43, 17 February 2014
, 17 February 2014→Generation indicators
(→Generation indicators: new section) |
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 130: | Line 130: | ||
I would really like to be able to see which pokemon are from which generation in this table. This would be very helpful for people who are not playing the newest generations and although the region groups mostly do this, there are still some families that are only partially available in some versions, e.g. in FireRed Lickitung exists, Lickilicky doesn't. What I effectively have in mind is a mix between this page and the [[List of Pokémon with cross-generational evolutions]]. — [[User:Molt|Molt]] ([[User talk:Molt|talk]]) 12:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | I would really like to be able to see which pokemon are from which generation in this table. This would be very helpful for people who are not playing the newest generations and although the region groups mostly do this, there are still some families that are only partially available in some versions, e.g. in FireRed Lickitung exists, Lickilicky doesn't. What I effectively have in mind is a mix between this page and the [[List of Pokémon with cross-generational evolutions]]. — [[User:Molt|Molt]] ([[User talk:Molt|talk]]) 12:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:This page does its job quite well as is. Generation does not ''need'' to be part of that job. That'd only be cluttering it up. Besides, at worst, it should only take ''one'' such misconception (like the person tried to evolve Lickitung in FRLG) before they investigate further and figure out things aren't as they thought. I think that's not too burdensome. (I also think it wouldn't be a problem for most people in the first place.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC) | |||