Talk:Boomburst (move): Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(+Strongest Regular Attack?)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Strongest Regular Attack?==
==Strongest Regular Attack?==
So, um... Is this move, with a power of 140, the strongest attack that A) doesn't require specific circumstances and B) doesn't have any negative side-effects? For example, {{m|Reversal}} can have a power of 200, but only at low-to-none HP. And {{m|Explosion}} is the almighty trump card at 250 power, but it has a minor drawback that prevents it from being used often. {{m|Hyper Beam}} has a nice 150, but prevents you from moving on the next turn. But Boomburst? Just use it and be happy, like any other regular attack. --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 18:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
So, um... Is this move, with a power of 140, the strongest attack that A) doesn't require specific circumstances and B) doesn't have any negative side-effects? For example, {{m|Reversal}} can have a power of 200, but only at low-to-none HP. And {{m|Explosion}} is the almighty trump card at 250 power, but it has a minor drawback that prevents it from being used often. {{m|Hyper Beam}} has a nice 150, but prevents you from moving on the next turn. But Boomburst? Just use it and be happy, like any other regular attack. --[[User:GuyPerfect|GuyPerfect]] ([[User talk:GuyPerfect|talk]]) 18:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
:I believe you are correct about it being the strongest regular attack. I can't think of anything else that has higher or the same power but without any drawbacks.--[[User:NOBODY|NOBODY]] ([[User talk:NOBODY|talk]]) 18:51, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
1,218

edits