30,369
edits
Talk:Gender: Difference between revisions
→On the naming of the "Other single-gendered Pokemon" section
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
:"Other" as opposed to each of the former sections (aside from the gender differences, which really shouldn't be grouped with the rest) which each describe certain specific types of single-gendered Pokemon. I object to "Single-gendered Pokemon families" on two grounds: (1) because Pokemon that do not evolve are not part of an evolutionary family, and that list is wrong about this as well and I object to it on the same grounds; and (2) because we must '''either''' include something in the title to indicate that it is only talking about Pokemon not previously mentioned in earlier sections '''or''' repeat those Pokemon in this section. In the interest of avoiding redundancy, I prefer the former. | :"Other" as opposed to each of the former sections (aside from the gender differences, which really shouldn't be grouped with the rest) which each describe certain specific types of single-gendered Pokemon. I object to "Single-gendered Pokemon families" on two grounds: (1) because Pokemon that do not evolve are not part of an evolutionary family, and that list is wrong about this as well and I object to it on the same grounds; and (2) because we must '''either''' include something in the title to indicate that it is only talking about Pokemon not previously mentioned in earlier sections '''or''' repeat those Pokemon in this section. In the interest of avoiding redundancy, I prefer the former. | ||
:Would you be less uncomfortable with my preferred title if we instead had two sections titled "Gender differences" and "Single-gendered Pokemon," the latter having further subheads titled "Related species," "Gender-based evolution" and the section we're contesting? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | :Would you be less uncomfortable with my preferred title if we instead had two sections titled "Gender differences" and "Single-gendered Pokemon," the latter having further subheads titled "Related species," "Gender-based evolution" and the section we're contesting? [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 05:30, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Since you've gone and edited it already, I'll say sure. But I made a couple of adjustments to satisfy my qualms with it. Mainly, that the "Gender-based evolution" section wasn't actually talking about single-gendered Pokemon in particular; it was more about a basic mechanic. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 05:55, 9 November 2013 (UTC) | |||