790
edits
Talk:Novelty Pokémon: Difference between revisions
→Beldum: new section
(→Legitimacy of Novelty Pokemon: new section) |
Enervation (talk | contribs) (→Beldum: new section) |
||
| Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
Since this talk page is almost all debates for or against why or why not a pokemon is considered novelty, why don't we add a section to the table that says "reason against" or something like that? For example, Sableye says it was the only pokemon with no weaknesses and has the ability stall, this is under the "reason" section of the table, then, under the "reason against" section of the table it could include how Stall is only it's ability half of the time and is no longer the only pokemon with no weaknesses. This would help remove the bias of the page. ([[User:Hijinga|Hijinga]] ([[User talk:Hijinga|talk]]) 04:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)) | Since this talk page is almost all debates for or against why or why not a pokemon is considered novelty, why don't we add a section to the table that says "reason against" or something like that? For example, Sableye says it was the only pokemon with no weaknesses and has the ability stall, this is under the "reason" section of the table, then, under the "reason against" section of the table it could include how Stall is only it's ability half of the time and is no longer the only pokemon with no weaknesses. This would help remove the bias of the page. ([[User:Hijinga|Hijinga]] ([[User talk:Hijinga|talk]]) 04:22, 19 June 2012 (UTC)) | ||
== Beldum == | |||
Is {{p|Beldum}} a novelty Pokémon? It has a low catch rate, and wild Beldum (excluding Dream World Beldum) have {{m|Take Down}} as their only move. Is {{p|Delcatty}} applicable too? [[Special:Contributions/Enervation|<span style="color:black">~</span>]][[User:Enervation|Enervation]] 16:40, 30 September 2012 (UTC) | |||