646
edits
Talk:Signature move: Difference between revisions
→V-create still a signature move?
| Line 648: | Line 648: | ||
: Sure, but if we go a long time without this kind of thing happening again (''event-exclusive'' signature moves being known by both the Pokémon they're intended for and another Pokémon ''on equal terms''), maybe the issue can be revisited.[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] 19:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | : Sure, but if we go a long time without this kind of thing happening again (''event-exclusive'' signature moves being known by both the Pokémon they're intended for and another Pokémon ''on equal terms''), maybe the issue can be revisited.[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] 19:31, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::It doesn't have to be revisited. Leave it alone. Admins have already spoken on the matter and say to leave it alone--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 19:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | ::It doesn't have to be revisited. Leave it alone. Admins have already spoken on the matter and say to leave it alone--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 19:33, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
::: I meant like several years or when Gen VI comes around with more event-exclusive moves. When I said "a long time", I meant "a long time" and that I don't think it's worth starting any further arguments at this point in Pokémon event history (so I'm leaving it alone).--[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] 19:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | ::: I meant like several years or when Gen VI comes around with more event-exclusive moves. When I said "a long time", I meant "a long time" and that I don't think it's worth starting any further arguments at this point in Pokémon event history (so I'm leaving it alone) Oh well, in any case it's just one minor piece of stating the obvious about one event, I shouldn't have made a big deal about it.--[[User:Darthrai|Darthrai]] 19:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC) | ||