1,252
edits
User talk:MisterE13: Difference between revisions
→Inquiry
m (→Inquiry) |
|||
| Line 461: | Line 461: | ||
::But how is provoking a user not punished? Pokegeek is an admin, as explained, and not only did he threaten me by teaming up with Satoshi101 to harass me, but also encouraged Satoshi101 to taunt me '''and''' admitted to breaking the code of conduct on my talkpage during the scuffle. Where's the punishment for that?--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 04:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ::But how is provoking a user not punished? Pokegeek is an admin, as explained, and not only did he threaten me by teaming up with Satoshi101 to harass me, but also encouraged Satoshi101 to taunt me '''and''' admitted to breaking the code of conduct on my talkpage during the scuffle. Where's the punishment for that?--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 04:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::Firstly, {{u|Poke.geek}} is not a staff member of any kind. Secondly, while not following the best course of action, only one of thier comments could even be considered breaking the code of conduct. A single comment is not sufficient reason to block under normal circumstances. They did not encourage Satoshi to taunt you, they were not hasassing you, simply defending their own actions. Finally, I will repeat, provoking a user '''''is punished and was punished in this case'''''. If you find yourself on the recieving end of provocation, the best response is to log out. Walk away, give yourself time to calm down. Reacting with an inflamatory comment on your own is behaviour that is highly likely to lead to a block. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | :::Firstly, {{u|Poke.geek}} is not a staff member of any kind. Secondly, while not following the best course of action, only one of thier comments could even be considered breaking the code of conduct. A single comment is not sufficient reason to block under normal circumstances. They did not encourage Satoshi to taunt you, they were not hasassing you, simply defending their own actions. Finally, I will repeat, provoking a user '''''is punished and was punished in this case'''''. If you find yourself on the recieving end of provocation, the best response is to log out. Walk away, give yourself time to calm down. Reacting with an inflamatory comment on your own is behaviour that is highly likely to lead to a block. <span class="sc">[[User:Werdnae|<span style="color:#2D4B98;">Werdnae</span>]]</span> <small>[[User talk:Werdnae|<span style="color:#009000;">(talk)</span>]]</small> 05:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
Except I was told only two of my comments were hostile, and the second one was completely appropriate. Pokegeek continued to remove my comments after claiming that I removed talkpage comments, telling me it was wrong. That's hypocrisy and rule breaking, thus I had every right to say Pokegeek was being a hypocrite--[[User:SandmanDP|SandmanDP]] 05:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC) | |||