713
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Staff: Difference between revisions
→Why isn't there Japanese staff? Is the Japanese discriminated with bulbapedia?
Sawamular101 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::Bulbapedia published the article that held the Japanese in derision on April 1. Bulbapedia laughed at the Japanese when the Japanese was crying. It was likely to have stopped it if there was a Japanese staff. There is no consideration to the Japanese. [[User:Sawamular101|Sawamular101]] 11:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC) | ::Bulbapedia published the article that held the Japanese in derision on April 1. Bulbapedia laughed at the Japanese when the Japanese was crying. It was likely to have stopped it if there was a Japanese staff. There is no consideration to the Japanese. [[User:Sawamular101|Sawamular101]] 11:35, 13 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm sure it was more like a tribute for the original Japanese version. Were the Japanese fans really offended?--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 11:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC) | :::I'm sure it was more like a tribute for the original Japanese version. Were the Japanese fans really offended?--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 11:39, 13 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
::: I looked like the article that held the Japanese in derision. Because the staff of Bulbapedia is noble, I might be wrong. [[User:Sawamular101|Sawamular101]] 12:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC) | |||