Talk:Mewtwo (M01): Difference between revisions

Undo revision 1459642 by Jdrawer (talk)Why are you doing that?
(Undo revision 1459642 by Jdrawer (talk)Why are you doing that?)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Ambertwo's death==
==Ambertwo's death==


When and where did anything ever say that Ambertwo and the other clones died from "exhaustion due to being a clone" in the birth of Mewtwo or anything for that matter. It is not explained why they die they just do to my knowledge, correct me if I'm wrong. Also, wo said the will of a human isn't as strong as the will of a pokemon? If thats true then the Ambertwo should have died first, then charmandertwo, followed by Squiertletwo and bulbasaurtwo, and that didn't happen.[[User:Wikid|Wikid]] 01:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
When and where did anything ever say that Ambertwo and the other clones died from "exhaustion due to being a clone" in the birth of Mewtwo or anything for that matter. It is not explained why they die they just do to my knowledge, correct me if I'm wrong. Also, wo said the will of a human isn't as strong as the will of a pokemon? If thats truw then the Ambertwo should have died first, then charmandertwo, followed by Squiertletwo and bulbasaurtwo, and that didn't happen.[[User:Wikid|Wikid]] 01:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


:As Jmath, JSFighter or anyone else has thus far not said anything to explain their added unlikely info, I have changed it back to what it last was. But I'm pretty certain that it never gives you the reason as to why they died at all, so even what I changed it to still seems rather wrong.--[[User:Tails Clock|Tails Clock]] 13:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
:As Jmath, JSFighter or anyone else has thus far not said anything to explain their added unlikely info, I have changed it back to what it last was. But I'm pretty certain that it never gives you the reason as to why they died at all, so even what I cahnged it to still seems rather wrong.--[[User:Tails Clock|Tails Clock]] 13:27, 25 September 2008 (UTC)


==Computer Attack==
==Computer Attack==