227
edits
Talk:Lola: Difference between revisions
→"Never returned"?: new section
(→Eyes?) |
Nathan2055 (talk | contribs) (→"Never returned"?: new section) |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
I think it should be deleted, for a very simple reason - ''this is not surprising watsoever''. There is no reason to even assume that she would have them. After all, the kids got it from their father, which she is (well, at least presumably) not biologically related to, so why would we expect her to have them too? Does anyone agree?--[[User:Goukazaru|Gou]] 03:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | I think it should be deleted, for a very simple reason - ''this is not surprising watsoever''. There is no reason to even assume that she would have them. After all, the kids got it from their father, which she is (well, at least presumably) not biologically related to, so why would we expect her to have them too? Does anyone agree?--[[User:Goukazaru|Gou]] 03:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
: I agree --[[User:Mr.lol|Mr.lol]] 04:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | : I agree --[[User:Mr.lol|Mr.lol]] 04:16, 31 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
== "Never returned"? == | |||
It says in the article that Flint never returned from his journey. He was a rock salesman for a long time in Pewter City, so the article should be edited to mention that, as the History and Triva sections contradict each other because of this. --[[User:Nathan2055|Nathan2055]][[User Talk:Nathan2055|<sup>talk</sup>]] 19:33, 11 February 2011 (UTC) | |||