74,014
edits
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 16:47, 16 November 2010
, 16 November 2010→Object (1)
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* I agree with Poli and Pokemaster. It is written really well and has enough pictures<small>{{tt|✱|...although Uxie and Garchomp probably should be English versions.}}</small>----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 14:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | * I agree with Poli and Pokemaster. It is written really well and has enough pictures<small>{{tt|✱|...although Uxie and Garchomp probably should be English versions.}}</small>----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 14:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
====Object ( | ====Object (2)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* Oppose. I feel like a FA should display more community contribution than this one does. <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 05:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | * Oppose. I feel like a FA should display more community contribution than this one does. <span style="border: 2px dotted #FFBBDD;">[[User:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;">梅子</span>]][[User talk:Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sup>❀</sup></span>]][[Special:Contributions/Umeko|<span style="color:#FF99CC;"><sub>✿</sub></span>]]</span> 05:00, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
* It does not seem to be written any better than some of the others. Not unique enough in my opinion to be considered a FAC. Good article, but among a sea of good articles over the same area, it doesn't stand out from others. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 16:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||
* I'd like to point out that I've done a lot of work with the archetypes lately and, as TCG strategy has long been neglected on Bulbapedia, it would be a huge boost for us in the eyes of the TCG-oriented fandom to give it a little more attention. Of course, I do that to the best of my ability, but now that we're getting more articles and they're higher quality, Bulbapedia as a whole ought to be making them a little more prominent. Plenty of TCG fans who visit Bulbapedia for other information may start making it their stop to research archetypes as well, if they see one featured on the front page. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 12:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | * I'd like to point out that I've done a lot of work with the archetypes lately and, as TCG strategy has long been neglected on Bulbapedia, it would be a huge boost for us in the eyes of the TCG-oriented fandom to give it a little more attention. Of course, I do that to the best of my ability, but now that we're getting more articles and they're higher quality, Bulbapedia as a whole ought to be making them a little more prominent. Plenty of TCG fans who visit Bulbapedia for other information may start making it their stop to research archetypes as well, if they see one featured on the front page. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 12:30, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||