12,084
edits
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate: Difference between revisions
Talk:LuxChomp (TCG)/Featured article candidate (view source)
Revision as of 02:48, 16 November 2010
, 16 November 2010no edit summary
Politoed666 (talk | contribs) m (Created page with "{{subst:FAC talk}} Nominating as an FAC candidate. Perhaps nominating your own article is frowned upon, but LuxChomp is a huge deal in the TCG right now, and has been arguably ...") |
Politoed666 (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
====Support (0)==== | ====Support (0)==== | ||
<!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | <!--Please remember to update the count along with your vote.--> | ||
* | * Nominating as an FAC candidate. Perhaps nominating your own article is frowned upon, but LuxChomp is a huge deal in the TCG right now, and has been arguably the most influential deck in the format for quite awhile. It's well-written, it looks good, and it will bring a lot more visibility to the archetype articles, which some people might not even be aware of. Let me know what the rest of you think. Thanks. --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#00B7EB">''P''</span> <span style="color:#008080">''o''</span>]] [[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#0095B6">''L''</span> <span style="color:#00CCCC">''i''</span>]] 02:47, 16 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
====Object (0)==== | ====Object (0)==== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
====Other comments==== | ====Other comments==== | ||