1,689
edits
Yaminokame (talk | contribs) m (→Thanks) |
m (→Thanks) |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
Also, I think your idea on the Advantage-types is a good way to put it in. Otherwise, it'd just look messy. Are they all 3/4 of the steps under advantage? --[[User:Oz|Oz]] 16:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | Also, I think your idea on the Advantage-types is a good way to put it in. Otherwise, it'd just look messy. Are they all 3/4 of the steps under advantage? --[[User:Oz|Oz]] 16:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:That's the problem that I was seeing too :( Adding more stuff visually seems a little too much for something so small, but I still feel that putting in "Advantageous type:" makes it a little bit less visually appealing... Maybe we should add a footnote that denotes the scroll-over text as the value with Advantageous type effects :p ... Yeah, they are 3/4 for all courses :) ([[User:Yaminokame|Yaminokame]] 16:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)) | :That's the problem that I was seeing too :( Adding more stuff visually seems a little too much for something so small, but I still feel that putting in "Advantageous type:" makes it a little bit less visually appealing... Maybe we should add a footnote that denotes the scroll-over text as the value with Advantageous type effects :p ... Yeah, they are 3/4 for all courses :) ([[User:Yaminokame|Yaminokame]] 16:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)) | ||
::As in {{tt|2000+|*1500+}} and then putting a "'''*Advantageous types only'''" or something along those lines? :) --[[User:Oz|Oz]] 16:44, 25 November 2009 (UTC) |
edits