3,848
edits
User talk:Yaminokame: Difference between revisions
m
→Thanks
m (→Thanks) |
Yaminokame (talk | contribs) m (→Thanks) |
||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
:::Yeah, that's me haha ^^ teamwork ftw indeed :D It's a good thing we checked serebii's list, there was an error on one of the moves XD ... Now I have to go tell serebii about the error...probably will go un-fixed for a while though lol... >___< ([[User:Yaminokame|Yaminokame]] 15:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)) | :::Yeah, that's me haha ^^ teamwork ftw indeed :D It's a good thing we checked serebii's list, there was an error on one of the moves XD ... Now I have to go tell serebii about the error...probably will go un-fixed for a while though lol... >___< ([[User:Yaminokame|Yaminokame]] 15:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)) | ||
Also, I think your idea on the Advantage-types is a good way to put it in. Otherwise, it'd just look messy. Are they all 3/4 of the steps under advantage? --[[User:Oz|Oz]] 16:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | Also, I think your idea on the Advantage-types is a good way to put it in. Otherwise, it'd just look messy. Are they all 3/4 of the steps under advantage? --[[User:Oz|Oz]] 16:35, 25 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
:That's the problem that I was seeing too :( Adding more stuff visually seems a little too much for something so small, but I still feel that putting in "Advantageous type:" makes it a little bit less visually appealing... Maybe we should add a footnote that denotes the scroll-over text as the value with Advantageous type effects :p ... Yeah, they are 3/4 for all courses :) ([[User:Yaminokame|Yaminokame]] 16:40, 25 November 2009 (UTC)) | |||