48
edits
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 4: Difference between revisions
→RE: Encounter Edits: new section
(→RE: Encounter Edits: new section) |
|||
| Line 373: | Line 373: | ||
Thanks for dealing with the vandalism from Joel, hate things I like that.--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 21:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | Thanks for dealing with the vandalism from Joel, hate things I like that.--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 21:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
:Meant to be I hate things like that.--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 21:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | :Meant to be I hate things like that.--[[User:BigDocFan|BigDocFan]] ([[User talk:BigDocFan|talk]]) 21:18, 20 July 2017 (UTC) | ||
== RE: Encounter Edits == | |||
As I've been playing through the series gen by gen recently, I've noticed that the more recent gens are full of misinformation on encounters. Diamond/Pearl had a few apparent hiccups, but I'm running into them all over the place in Black/White. Serebii's database is even worse, listing pokemon in completely incorrect routes and areas. It's clear that the encounter rates thus far have all gone on people's experiences and nothing else. I'm just adding mine to the pool--and mind you, I'm changing nothing unless it's been hours upon hours and I'm absolutely, 100% sure. | |||
If you want to dig up ROM data, by all means, feel free. It has not been done with this encounter tables. I don't have the time or interest in doing it, either--again, I'm just adding my contribution to improve the tables. Even if it won't make them 100% perfect, it will be a step closer to perfect accuracy. If you want to make the tables LESS accurate by reverting my changes, I can't stop you; I went out of my way to improve the data, but if that generous act is not appreciated, I'm fine not bothering. [[User:Xelrog T. Apocalypse|- Xelrog T. Apocalypse]] ([[User talk:Xelrog T. Apocalypse|talk]]) 18:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC) | |||