User talk:SnorlaxMonster: Difference between revisions

→‎Mt. Coronet: new section
No edit summary
(→‎Mt. Coronet: new section)
Line 1,058: Line 1,058:


Could you do something about Pikablu's recent edit to SM118, where they deleted a trivia point just because they didn't find it important enough. That user seems to have a problem with me every now and then and seeing as we add trivia points about the previews, I don't see what good reason there could have been for Pikablu to delete that trivia point. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 18:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Could you do something about Pikablu's recent edit to SM118, where they deleted a trivia point just because they didn't find it important enough. That user seems to have a problem with me every now and then and seeing as we add trivia points about the previews, I don't see what good reason there could have been for Pikablu to delete that trivia point. [[User:Playerking95|Playerking95]] ([[User talk:Playerking95|talk]]) 18:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
== Mt. Coronet ==
Several of the wild Pokemon tables on [[Mt. Coronet]] have percentages that add up to more than 100% or seem to conflict with Serebii's tables. Can you verify them like you did for Route 204? [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 01:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
3,240

edits