40,974
edits
User talk:Fossilgojira: Difference between revisions
m
Reverted edits by Spyspotter (talk) to last revision by Kogoro
Fossilgojira (talk | contribs) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by Spyspotter (talk) to last revision by Kogoro) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::::::::Seriously... Listen to the administration, if we tell you not to add something, don't add it. If we tell you to discuss it on a talk page before adding it, then either discuss it or leave the page alone. We're the administration here for a '''very''' good reason, and you need to understand that if we say or do something, you ''really'' shouldn't undo it. Oh, and another thing... If you do get blocked, returning on another account is called using a sock puppet, and that will only get you a longer block and a permanent block for the sock. If you do sock, we will find out, and you will be reprimanded for doing so. So, to make life easier for you, and everyone else... Follow the rules & listen to the admins. Okay, thanks. - [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''<sc>Kogoro</sc>'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''<sc>Talk to me</sc>'''</span>]] - 18:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | :::::::::Seriously... Listen to the administration, if we tell you not to add something, don't add it. If we tell you to discuss it on a talk page before adding it, then either discuss it or leave the page alone. We're the administration here for a '''very''' good reason, and you need to understand that if we say or do something, you ''really'' shouldn't undo it. Oh, and another thing... If you do get blocked, returning on another account is called using a sock puppet, and that will only get you a longer block and a permanent block for the sock. If you do sock, we will find out, and you will be reprimanded for doing so. So, to make life easier for you, and everyone else... Follow the rules & listen to the admins. Okay, thanks. - [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''<sc>Kogoro</sc>'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''<sc>Talk to me</sc>'''</span>]] - 18:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::You are not god just because you have a title and you never will be. Thinking that the administration or an administrator will be correct in every foreseeable scenario is ignorant to the N-th degree. And you didn't understand what I meant about being blocked: Just because you ban someone from on IP address doesn't mean squat when their are computers that can access the internet everywhere, and if you do choose to ban me for being "insubordinate" or "a disruption", that will only prove that you are drunk on power and would sooner 'remove' myself or anyone similar rather than accept the fact that you are no more important than anyone else. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 18:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ::::::::::You are not god just because you have a title and you never will be. Thinking that the administration or an administrator will be correct in every foreseeable scenario is ignorant to the N-th degree. And you didn't understand what I meant about being blocked: Just because you ban someone from on IP address doesn't mean squat when their are computers that can access the internet everywhere, and if you do choose to ban me for being "insubordinate" or "a disruption", that will only prove that you are drunk on power and would sooner 'remove' myself or anyone similar rather than accept the fact that you are no more important than anyone else. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 18:43, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::Look, bud. Mismagius is no more feminine than Murkrow is. Whoop-dee-doo it's based on a witch. So what? It doesn't have a ''dress'' like Gardevoir. Its name comes from "mischief" and "mage", and is combined with the name of its prevolution, much like Ambipom and Honchkrow are based on the names of ''their'' prevolutions. The "mis" does not have anything to do with it being ''intended'' as female-only or they'd've made it female-only, or even ''majority'' female like Clefable is. Its Japanese name doesn't evoke a gender, and that's where the biggest point lies: muma means nightmare! Nothing else, male or female about it! And unlike Gardevoir also, Game Freak didn't bother to make a divergent evolution chain for males and females because ''Misdreavus and Mismagius are not overtly of either gender''. Look at the first image you get in Google's search for Gandalf. Mismagius looks just as much like him as it does the Wicked Witch of the West, or even moreso like him. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 21:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::Why do you think I changed the wording to reflect different views in the first place? "Despite it's appearance" is utterly neutral and does not support either claim, so someone who sees it as masculine can then read it and be shown that it has equally feminine traits. There is NO reason for you to delete this.[[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 22:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::Actually, "despite its appearance" implies that its appearance goes one way or the other. Also, really, stop being annoying. It isn't cool to fight the power here, we aren't in 9th grade anymore. You aren't willing to have a reasoned discourse, we aren't all out to get you, and in the end, the power structure here--even if it's arbitrary!--is still the one that we go by. And it will be enforced. If you want to have a prolonged discussion about this issue, as I said, do it on talk pages. And don't get into edit wars. And stop acting like you're five. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 22:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::::::::::::"Actually, "despite its appearance" implies that its appearance goes one way or the other." Fine how about this then? "Despite its appearance, Mismagmius has an equal chance of being male or female, and has traits of both." And I never said that I thought you were "all out to get me", just that I couldn't care any less of you being a moderator as it means utterly nothing regarding who is right or wrong in any situation, just because you can ban someone doesn't mean that you were right and they were wrong. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 22:18, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::::::::::By the way, you messed up the grammar anyway. "It's" is the contraction of "it is". "Its" is what you're looking for. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 22:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
:You pretty much guranteed yourself an infinite ban. You pretty much told them you would be sockpuppeting.[[User:DCM]] 23:11, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Edit wars and compromise == | == Edit wars and compromise == | ||
Apparently there's been some problems. Don't edit war. To compromise, work on talk pages. Also, admins don't just throw around power for the hell of it. They generally know what they're doing. This happens to be one of those cases where they do, in fact, know what they're doing. If you disagree, as I said, work it out on talk pages, not by edit wars. Because, as other people have said, edit warring will get you banned. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 06:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | Apparently there's been some problems. Don't edit war. To compromise, work on talk pages. Also, admins don't just throw around power for the hell of it. They generally know what they're doing. This happens to be one of those cases where they do, in fact, know what they're doing. If you disagree, as I said, work it out on talk pages, not by edit wars. Because, as other people have said, edit warring will get you banned. -- '''[[User:evkl|<span style="color:#000099">evkl</span>]]''' <sub>[[User_talk:evkl|<span style="color:#006699">(need to talk?)</span>]]</sub> 06:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
== Blocked == | |||
Alright. Three edit wars over the same piece of opinionated, useless trivia. You then say on the talk page of the article, ''"I'll never stop until it stays there, and none of you even have a reason to fight me as I've made it more than evident that I'm willing to re-write it until it comes across clearly that despite looking blatantly male or female to whomever sees it, it has defining traits of either."'' So, you have blatantly shown you have no plans to '''ever''' listen to authority, or even common sense. That's {{tt|strike three|Hehe, baseball analogy}}, you're out. - [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''<sc>Kogoro</sc>'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''<sc>Talk to me</sc>'''</span>]] - 23:13, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||