1,953
edits
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10: Difference between revisions
User talk:Force Fire/Archive 10 (view source)
Revision as of 17:20, 30 September 2019
, 30 September 2019→How the hell is that different?
Unowninator (talk | contribs) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1,537: | Line 1,537: | ||
::The dex trivia isn't a "uniqueness" trivia. It's not saying they all share something, it's saying they've appeared in all Pokedexes.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 16:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | ::The dex trivia isn't a "uniqueness" trivia. It's not saying they all share something, it's saying they've appeared in all Pokedexes.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#EBC600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#EBC600">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#D8B600">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#D8B600">ire</span>]] 16:41, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::Sounds like they share that in common IMO. [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 17:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | :::Sounds like they share that in common IMO. [[User:Unowninator|¿¡Unowninator?!]] ([[User talk:Unowninator|talk]]) 17:04, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | ||
::::I'm with Unowninator here too... it absolutely is saying they all share something. The word "only" indicates that it is, in fact, a "uniqueness" trivia. The format and structure is basically the same between the two examples. Definitely a double standard here. | |||
::::I agree that the not unique=not notable rule is a very silly rule. It's still very noteworthy that Sirfetch'd loses a type upon evolution, regardless of if Bellossom is the same case. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#00A1E9">cela</span><span style="color:#BF004F">donk</span>]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 17:20, 30 September 2019 (UTC) | |||