editlock-exempt
2,537
edits
Talk:Zekrom (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Dragon/Electric type!: new section
HoennMaster (talk | contribs) (No, you always put new comments at the bottom.) |
(→Dragon/Electric type!: new section) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:::::Part of being a Pokémon encyclopedia is reporting what we know. We know that they're Dragon-type. We don't know anything else about their types. That's why it says Dragon and nothing else (not even a ???). —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 12:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | :::::Part of being a Pokémon encyclopedia is reporting what we know. We know that they're Dragon-type. We don't know anything else about their types. That's why it says Dragon and nothing else (not even a ???). —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 12:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::Not counting Daisuke Club, where was it confirmed? Forgive me if I'm slow. [[User:Mudkipchan|Mudkipchan]] 06:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | ::::::Not counting Daisuke Club, where was it confirmed? Forgive me if I'm slow. [[User:Mudkipchan|Mudkipchan]] 06:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Dragon/Electric type! == | |||
Ok, so the host of Pokemon Sunday accidentally posted on her blog that Zekrom was Dragon/Electric, and then shortly after she deleted it because of obvious reasons. Here is the proof.. http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/5286/zkrtype2.jpg . I Don't know if you need more proof, but that really is proof in itself really. --[[User:S2daam|S2daam]] 10:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | |||