9,385
edits
Talk:Zekrom (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
No, you always put new comments at the bottom.
Rai Marshall (talk | contribs) |
HoennMaster (talk | contribs) (No, you always put new comments at the bottom.) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::: Well now they are confirmed that they are Dragon types, so yea... [[User:Ninterror|Ninterror]] 11:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ::: Well now they are confirmed that they are Dragon types, so yea... [[User:Ninterror|Ninterror]] 11:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::But it has never been said they are dual types, even though they might. For now, this is all we have.--[[User:KurowaSan|KurowaSan]] 12:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ::::But it has never been said they are dual types, even though they might. For now, this is all we have.--[[User:KurowaSan|KurowaSan]] 12:24, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::: | :::::Part of being a Pokémon encyclopedia is reporting what we know. We know that they're Dragon-type. We don't know anything else about their types. That's why it says Dragon and nothing else (not even a ???). —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 12:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
Part of being a Pokémon encyclopedia is reporting what we know. We know that they're Dragon-type. We don't know anything else about their types. That's why it says Dragon and nothing else (not even a ???). —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 12:49, 30 May 2010 (UTC) | ::::::Not counting Daisuke Club, where was it confirmed? Forgive me if I'm slow. [[User:Mudkipchan|Mudkipchan]] 06:31, 31 May 2010 (UTC) | ||