Talk:Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pokémon controversy (view source)

23 bytes added , 14 June 2020

m

1,953

edits

Revision as of 20:02, 14 June 2020 (view source) LestherIvy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should we bring up the Pokemon Go Battle League exploit as a controversy?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:05, 14 June 2020 (view source) Celadonkey (talk \| contribs) m (→‎Should we bring up the Pokemon Go Battle League exploit as a controversy?) Newer edit →
Line 159:		Line 159:

	If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p\|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold.		If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p\|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold.
	Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page?		Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page?{{unsigned\|LestherIvy}}