Talk:Johanna's Glameow: Difference between revisions

Line 10: Line 10:
:We don't really have enough proof... ---> [[User:223david|<span style="color:#D42E2E;">'''223'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/223david|<span style="color:#B69E00;">☆</span>]][[User talk:223david|<span style="color:#2E2ED4;">'''Dåv]d'''</span>]]''' 10:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
:We don't really have enough proof... ---> [[User:223david|<span style="color:#D42E2E;">'''223'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/223david|<span style="color:#B69E00;">☆</span>]][[User talk:223david|<span style="color:#2E2ED4;">'''Dåv]d'''</span>]]''' 10:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
:: Couldn't we tell by the placement of Glameow, and Umbreon in relation to Piplup and Pachirisu? As in who was straight across from each other. There's also the unlikeliness that Johanna would risk using attract with both her Pokemon in comparison to Dawn's. Johanna must've known attract would work. I think both Umbreon and Glameow are female, simply because they acted very similar. Possibly even having the same personality.--[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 19:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:: Couldn't we tell by the placement of Glameow, and Umbreon in relation to Piplup and Pachirisu? As in who was straight across from each other. There's also the unlikeliness that Johanna would risk using attract with both her Pokemon in comparison to Dawn's. Johanna must've known attract would work. I think both Umbreon and Glameow are female, simply because they acted very similar. Possibly even having the same personality.--[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 19:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:::Well, if the attracts went in a straight line, Umbreon's would have hit Piplup [[User:Torngentleman2|MAMOSWINEPwnz! (Torngentleman2)]] 19:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


== Quick Attack ==
== Quick Attack ==