Talk:Johanna's Glameow: Difference between revisions

m
Line 11: Line 11:
:: Couldn't we tell by the placement of Glameow, and Umbreon in relation to Piplup and Pachirisu? As in who was straight across from each other. There's also the unlikeliness that Johanna would risk using attract with both her Pokemon in comparison to Dawn's. Johanna must've known attract would work. I think both Umbreon and Glameow are female, simply because they acted very similar. Possibly even having the same personality.--[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 19:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:: Couldn't we tell by the placement of Glameow, and Umbreon in relation to Piplup and Pachirisu? As in who was straight across from each other. There's also the unlikeliness that Johanna would risk using attract with both her Pokemon in comparison to Dawn's. Johanna must've known attract would work. I think both Umbreon and Glameow are female, simply because they acted very similar. Possibly even having the same personality.--[[User:Dman dustin|Dman dustin]] 19:19, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
:::Well, if the attracts went in a straight line, Umbreon's would have hit Piplup [[User:Torngentleman2|MAMOSWINEPwnz! (Torngentleman2)]] 19:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
:::Well, if the attracts went in a straight line, Umbreon's would have hit Piplup [[User:Torngentleman2|MAMOSWINEPwnz! (Torngentleman2)]] 19:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
::::Except there's zero proof that the Attracts actually did go in a straight line.  The episode presented the Attracts in a way that we couldn't tell which Attract hit whom.  --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 19:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


== Quick Attack ==
== Quick Attack ==
51,133

edits