5,094
edits
Talk:Imprison (move): Difference between revisions
→No shared moves = "sealed the opponent's move(s)" or "But it failed" ?
Stratelier (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
I'm pretty sure that if one attempts to use Imprison against an opponent with no moves in common, the move '''will''' execute as normal (just to no practical effect), as opposed to the game declaring "But it failed!". Thoughts? --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 18:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC) | I'm pretty sure that if one attempts to use Imprison against an opponent with no moves in common, the move '''will''' execute as normal (just to no practical effect), as opposed to the game declaring "But it failed!". Thoughts? --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 18:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
: Oops, spoke too soon - this was a change implemented in [[Generation V]]. New question though; because the effect is linked to the ''user'' and the opponent's ''team'', this means that if the opponent switches out, the new Pokémon is also subjected to Imprison's effects, right? --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 18:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC) | : Oops, spoke too soon - this was a change implemented in [[Generation V]]. New question though; because the effect is linked to the ''user'' and the opponent's ''team'', this means that if the opponent switches out, the new Pokémon is also subjected to Imprison's effects, right? --''[[User:Stratelier|Stratelier]]'' 18:10, 24 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
::I assume it just affects the opposing team, preventing them from using a move the user knows. Haven't really tried if it affects the user's team yet, but I can try it out and see. [[User:Berrenta|Berrenta]] ([[User talk:Berrenta|talk]]) 21:22, 24 December 2012 (UTC) | |||