766
edits
Talk:EP128: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Lilkaykaygal (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:::::::It's actually quite obvious, if you actually open up Audacity and reverse it. I don't know how it isn't notable how not just the voice actor, but also (possibly) the writers and several others involved decided to put in a shoutout, however negative, to 4kids and the "father" of advertising using cartoons. To say that it isn't confirmed and then to not listen is kind of backwards. As was said before, this isn't the ridiculous kind of backward message where if you listen to "Another One Bites the Dust" backwards it kind of barely says "It's fun to smoke marijuana." This was quite obviously put in by the dubbers. [[User:Girog|Girog]] 01:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | :::::::It's actually quite obvious, if you actually open up Audacity and reverse it. I don't know how it isn't notable how not just the voice actor, but also (possibly) the writers and several others involved decided to put in a shoutout, however negative, to 4kids and the "father" of advertising using cartoons. To say that it isn't confirmed and then to not listen is kind of backwards. As was said before, this isn't the ridiculous kind of backward message where if you listen to "Another One Bites the Dust" backwards it kind of barely says "It's fun to smoke marijuana." This was quite obviously put in by the dubbers. [[User:Girog|Girog]] 01:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::::::::Just what I was talking about. [[User:Mutak94|<span style="color:blue">////Mutak94\\\\</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Mutak94|<span style="color:yellow">Talk</span>]])''</small> 08:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ::::::::Just what I was talking about. [[User:Mutak94|<span style="color:blue">////Mutak94\\\\</span>]] <small>''([[User talk:Mutak94|<span style="color:yellow">Talk</span>]])''</small> 08:04, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::Link to video showing it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZlIcJbbm08&feature=related It's irritating if moderators, not only don't consider putting in legitimate evidence, but don't even look into it. And it's legitimate, as when the clip is played forwards, James sounds like he's talking backwards (those little scratching sounds prove this) and when played forwards, it doesn't sound like it's being played backwards, and sounds perfectly clear. And, no, it does not mean it's a coincidence only because it was found when playing it backwards. That's a generalization and an assumption. | :::::::::Link to video showing it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZlIcJbbm08&feature=related It's irritating if moderators, not only don't consider putting in legitimate evidence, but don't even look into it. And it's legitimate, as when the clip is played forwards, James sounds like he's talking backwards (those little scratching sounds prove this) and when played forwards, it doesn't sound like it's being played backwards, and sounds perfectly clear. And, no, it does not mean it's a coincidence only because it was found when playing it backwards. That's a generalization and an assumption.--{{unsigned|LD1808}} | ||