93
edits
Talk:Ash's Charizard/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
If you think that saying that Ash's Pokémon SEEM to be male is sexist, then you need to GROW THE FUCK UP. | If you think that saying that Ash's Pokémon SEEM to be male is sexist, then you need to GROW THE FUCK UP. | ||
The anime makes it VERY clear when a Pokémon is a female, either by its behavior, | The anime makes it VERY clear when a Pokémon is a female, either by its appearance, or it behavior (look at Ash's Chikorita). | ||
Moreover, the anime NEVER stated that a Pokémon whose gender hadn't been previously revealed, is female, at it would be too bizarre. | |||
If they didn't bother at making a Pokémon, girly-like, then the Pokémon is EXTREMELY likely to be a male (again, I have yet to see a case where the opposite happened). But if the writers made it act manly, like they did with Charizard when he is in the presence of Liza's female Charizard, then it's OBVIOUS that it is a male. | |||
:Okay, yeah most likely Charizard is male. But being that there are some people that feel that it could be otherwise, maybe we should leave it as unknown until it is 100% confirmed. I mean Pikachu has just as much evidence that it is male as Charizard and yet we still refuse to call it that. It's a little hypocritical. | :Okay, yeah most likely Charizard is male. But being that there are some people that feel that it could be otherwise, maybe we should leave it as unknown until it is 100% confirmed. I mean Pikachu has just as much evidence that it is male as Charizard and yet we still refuse to call it that. It's a little hypocritical. | ||