Talk:Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 25: Line 25:
We have a double context here - it's a swastika from the POV of the complainers, and it's a manji from the POV of the artist. The reason why both POVs are correct: they're the same damn thing at heart! Just different connotations.
We have a double context here - it's a swastika from the POV of the complainers, and it's a manji from the POV of the artist. The reason why both POVs are correct: they're the same damn thing at heart! Just different connotations.


Now, why don't we avoid all this ridiculous controversy and call it ''that damned symbol which appears to be a cross with its arms bent clockwise which invokes memories of facism and racism in the West and Buddhism in the East'' - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 01:23, 29 August 2005 (CDT)
Now, why don't we avoid all this ridiculous controversy and call it [[wp:Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars_ever#Names|''that damned symbol which appears to be a cross with its arms bent clockwise which invokes memories of facism and racism in the West and Buddhism in the East'']] - [[User:Zhen Lin|振霖]]<sub>[[User talk:Zhen Lin|T]]</sub> 01:23, 29 August 2005 (CDT)


==Flying Kids==
==Flying Kids==