877
edits
Talk:Core series: Difference between revisions
→Counter-pruductive edit warring: new section
(→Counter-pruductive edit warring: new section) |
|||
| Line 789: | Line 789: | ||
::That's kind of the whole idea behind me asking about in-game info to determine when they take place in relation to other games without said tweet? [[User:BulbaSq|BulbaSq]] ([[User talk:BulbaSq|talk]]) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) | ::That's kind of the whole idea behind me asking about in-game info to determine when they take place in relation to other games without said tweet? [[User:BulbaSq|BulbaSq]] ([[User talk:BulbaSq|talk]]) 18:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Counter-pruductive edit warring == | |||
I have completely had it with this edit warring about an inaccurate "timeline", which is based off a 25+ year old official guidebook in which most of it's contents were retconned compared to modern Pokémon lore (which already proves said book to be an unreliable source) as "evidence", and a single Porygon dex entry which is moreorless a simple reference to a release date in the real world from a 20th anniversary game. Doesn't help it already reeks of confirmation bias, relying on a deleted tweet. Isn't it suspicious that the writer deleted his tweet shortly after posting it? Coupled with Masuda heavily implying that the series uses a floating timeline as of Sword and Shield, I don't believe the tweet is to be taken at face value. At this rate, removing the timeline section entirely is the only way to put a stop to this stupid warring for good. Plus, neither the anime and manga articles have this section, so why should this page? [[User:Inkster|Inkster]] ([[User talk:Inkster|talk]]) 17:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC) | |||