1,953
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Signature policy: Difference between revisions
→Timestamp requirement
(→Timestamp requirement: new section) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
May I ask that this policy be edited to make more explicit the requirement that a signature have a timestamp? It's implied via the fact that it calls for four tildes instead of three and that it calls for the use of the "your signature with timestamp" button, but as far as I can see there is no explicitly spelled-out ''requirement'' to include a timestamp, and it seems [[User talk:Hamfart#Signature 2|some users]] may be intentionally using only three tildes in order to omit the timestamp. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 16:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | May I ask that this policy be edited to make more explicit the requirement that a signature have a timestamp? It's implied via the fact that it calls for four tildes instead of three and that it calls for the use of the "your signature with timestamp" button, but as far as I can see there is no explicitly spelled-out ''requirement'' to include a timestamp, and it seems [[User talk:Hamfart#Signature 2|some users]] may be intentionally using only three tildes in order to omit the timestamp. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 16:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | ||
:If a user is intentionally only using three, then that is a breaking of the signature policy, and it seems to me like Hamfart is breaking it. --[[User:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#287a43">Celad</span>]][[User_talk:Celadonkey|<span style="color:#e85545">onkey</span>]] 16:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC) | |||