71
edits
Talk:Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Versions: Difference between revisions
Talk:Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen Versions (view source)
Revision as of 22:40, 22 October 2016
, 22 October 2016→Quality standards
Super goku (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
What exactly is wrong with the Changes section? [[User:Easyaspi314|Easyaspi314]] ([[User talk:Easyaspi314|talk]]) 05:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC) | What exactly is wrong with the Changes section? [[User:Easyaspi314|Easyaspi314]] ([[User talk:Easyaspi314|talk]]) 05:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
:To quote SatoMew, specifically the following revision ({{special:diff/2330238}}), "Instead of lists of changes and new things, rewrite it as prose and avoid unnecessary details. Get rid of trivia as far as possible, relocating the info where appropriate (most trivia is not notable)." Either way, comparing it to other articles, it seems like it is ok in my book. (Especially compared to the size of ORAS's section...) If there is an issue, it would be the lack of a "Mechanics inherited from later generations" section. --[[User:Super goku|Super goku]] ([[User talk:Super goku|talk]]) 06:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC) | :To quote SatoMew, specifically the following revision ({{special:diff/2330238}}), "Instead of lists of changes and new things, rewrite it as prose and avoid unnecessary details. Get rid of trivia as far as possible, relocating the info where appropriate (most trivia is not notable)." Either way, comparing it to other articles, it seems like it is ok in my book. (Especially compared to the size of ORAS's section...) If there is an issue, it would be the lack of a "Mechanics inherited from later generations" section. --[[User:Super goku|Super goku]] ([[User talk:Super goku|talk]]) 06:44, 22 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
A lot of Pokemon fans specifically look for the changes and trivia section and consider them interesting pieces of information. However we have to make sure that the trivia doesn't fit anywhere else otherwise it looks disorganized and it could be essentially repeating the same information twice. | |||