238
edits
Talk:Clemont's Chespin: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
::We are not "wrong" about that. The policy is not flawed, you're just mired in {{wp|confirmation bias}}; there's '''''no reason''''' to think it will ''always'' be like you want to assume. At any point, the show could introduce a situation that runs completely counter to ''your'' assumptions, and it would contradict '''''nothing''''' essential to the show. | ::We are not "wrong" about that. The policy is not flawed, you're just mired in {{wp|confirmation bias}}; there's '''''no reason''''' to think it will ''always'' be like you want to assume. At any point, the show could introduce a situation that runs completely counter to ''your'' assumptions, and it would contradict '''''nothing''''' essential to the show. | ||
::The policy will not change. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ::The policy will not change. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 17:37, 9 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
:::You're talking to guy who won the argument a Ash's Froakie being "confirmed" to hatch from an egg and I also have an above average IQ I think I know what I'm talking about. And tell how many times has a Pokémon not been the gender it was implied to have? That Purrloin from BW doesn't count for anything because that was a plot device. | |||