77,854
edits
Talk:Flying Press (move): Difference between revisions
→Typing
(→Typing) |
|||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Given the typing of this move, it presents the possibility of future moves doing the same, no matter how few. Wouldn't this justify reworking the relevant templates to accept double-type parameters, like the individual Pokemon infoboxes? [[User:Draceon|Draceon]] ([[User talk:Draceon|talk]]) 01:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | Given the typing of this move, it presents the possibility of future moves doing the same, no matter how few. Wouldn't this justify reworking the relevant templates to accept double-type parameters, like the individual Pokemon infoboxes? [[User:Draceon|Draceon]] ([[User talk:Draceon|talk]]) 01:13, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
:Since this is the only one, we won't be needing anything like that ''for now''. When Gen VII introduces more, maybe.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 03:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | :Since this is the only one, we won't be needing anything like that ''for now''. When Gen VII introduces more, maybe.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#AB2813">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#C87365">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#26649C">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#729ABF">ire</span>]] 03:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
::Additionally, this move is ''only'' Fighting-type. It has an effect that also gives it the effectiveness of a Flying-type move, but for all other mechanics it is a Fighting-type move. Even if we get more, I don't think we should have an additional display. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 17:34, 8 January 2015 (UTC) | |||
== Protean? == | == Protean? == | ||