13,669
edits
User talk:Tiddlywinks/Archive 4: Difference between revisions
→Genderless vs. gender unknown
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
:I kind of meant you should talk about it "publicly" on the article's talk page, not come to me individually. I think that'd be more useful. | :I kind of meant you should talk about it "publicly" on the article's talk page, not come to me individually. I think that'd be more useful. | ||
:(FYI, one thing I didn't have space to write is that I'm not rightly sure what makes genderless canon as you claimed. If you can specify the sources you were thinking of, I'd love to know it. Again, though, I don't mean here.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | :(FYI, one thing I didn't have space to write is that I'm not rightly sure what makes genderless canon as you claimed. If you can specify the sources you were thinking of, I'd love to know it. Again, though, I don't mean here.) [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 01:40, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | ||
::(The source I was relying on was... the fact that we use the term and don't use a "fan name" template on top of its page. That's all... I'll bring it up on the [[genderless]] talk page, since that disambig seems to be the grandparent of anywhere that might be relevant.) [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 02:04, 20 April 2017 (UTC) | |||