19
edits
Talk:Nature: Difference between revisions
→In defense of the list and the table.: new section
(→Trainer-card.: new section) |
TheHateHat (talk | contribs) (→In defense of the list and the table.: new section) |
||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
Would it be possible to gather some details about the nature-specific phrases? [[User:PLA|PLA]] ([[User talk:PLA|talk]]) 10:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | Would it be possible to gather some details about the nature-specific phrases? [[User:PLA|PLA]] ([[User talk:PLA|talk]]) 10:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
== In defense of the list and the table. == | |||
The list is easier to look at if you're wondering what a specific nature does, and I would wager the vast majority of visits to the page are "what was X, again?" | |||
The table is easier to look at if you're hunting a particular nature, i.e. "I need attack up and SP.Atk down..." | |||
Keeping both isn't a problem, but if you were going to use one- it is easier to use the list to look up a nature than it is to use the table to look up what a nature does, especially given the color-coded nature of the site. | |||
My only gripe is that since the "neutral" natures are technically increases and decreases to the same stat, they should be arranged within the table as such. It's probably more misleading than the current format, but the blank spaces bug me. 2 Cents | |||
[[User:TheHateHat|TheHateHat]] ([[User talk:TheHateHat|talk]]) 03:51, 12 December 2012 (UTC) | |||