Talk:Legendary trio: Difference between revisions

Talk:Legendary trio (view source)

441 bytes added , 10 March 2012

211

edits

Revision as of 10:27, 9 March 2012 (view source) Saiph charon (talk \| contribs) (→‎Musketeers' status as a trio) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:40, 10 March 2012 (view source) HeroicJay (talk \| contribs) (→‎Musketeers' status as a trio) Newer edit →
Line 179:		Line 179:

	Know what? There should simply be a single page about groups of legendary pokemon...--[[User:Saiph charon\|Saiph charon]] 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)		Know what? There should simply be a single page about groups of legendary pokemon...--[[User:Saiph charon\|Saiph charon]] 10:27, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
			: The Musketeers were on the page but were apparently dropped... by an Administrator, but with no explanation or (if this talk page is any indication) apparent consensus. Fourth member or no, I'd say the Musketeers are far more in line with the birds/beasts/golems/faeries than the Kamis are - as far as in-game roles go, the Kamis function far more like Lati@s with a third member. --[[User:HeroicJay\|HeroicJay]] 03:40, 10 March 2012 (UTC)