1,955
edits
Talk:Legendary Pokémon: Difference between revisions
m
→Changes to legendary definition
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 247: | Line 247: | ||
::Interesting. So, what will the verdict be? Personally, I think we should wait a bit but I would like to see some of these Pokémon as legendary. Just my opinion though. --[[User:Celadonkey|--Celadonkey]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | ::Interesting. So, what will the verdict be? Personally, I think we should wait a bit but I would like to see some of these Pokémon as legendary. Just my opinion though. --[[User:Celadonkey|--Celadonkey]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
So does this mean we now have new Pokemon class and groups just like the Legendary and Mythical? It sounds like those Pokemon are in their own group.--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 01:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | So does this mean we now have new Pokemon class and groups just like the Legendary and Mythical? It sounds like those Pokemon are in their own group.--[[User:Jacob9594|Jacob Kogan]] ([[User talk:Jacob9594|talk]]) 01:14, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:That especially I'd hold off until. It's kind of out of the blue to create a new group like that and I | :That especially I'd hold off until. It's kind of out of the blue to create a new group like that and I wouldn't unless, or maybe ''even'', the Pokémon in question are very out of the ordinary. And even so, it's up to the mods. --[[User:Celadonkey|--Celadonkey]] ([[User talk:Celadonkey|talk]]) 02:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC) | ||